‘Camp’, playing at the Ensemble, written by Gary Baxter and
directed by Mark Kilmurry, is a nice play. It’s a fun play. It’s not going to
change the way you view theatre but this simple, snappy local work is a crowd
pleaser.
But ‘simple’ plays are deceptive. Often they’re not simple
at all because sometimes characters can seem under-developed, timing is crucial,
design is integral and hitting each beat and breath is paramount in making it
seem flawless and plump with possibilities. There are no tricks to hide behind,
no Richard III hanging from a harness and spinning like a circus act. Nope.
Just acting, tight direction and utilising every element available to keep the
ball rolling till the end. I think for the most part, Kilmurry and Baxter have
achieved this in ‘Camp’.
As you would imagine, the play is set in a crowded campsite
on Boxing Day and our characters, three married couples and their kids
(thankfully, never seen and just heard or implied) encounter every obstacle you would expect- deadly
wildlife, obnoxious fellow campers, extreme weather conditions, drunks,
disorganisation and marriages in crisis. We all recognise the situation and
environment of camping. People either love it or hate it. I would rather donate
a kidney than go camping and the misery of the experience is obvious and yet,
like all adversity, there seems to be a badge of honour in also surviving it.
There are a few things that impressed me about this play and
the most obvious is lead actress, Michelle Doake. She is incredible. Doake’s skill
in comic timing, grounded in such truth, raised this play to heights that a
lesser actor could not have done. You could feel the tension in the audience as we were drawn into her every moment and the joy of her presence on stage.
Doake is also fortunate that she has the most well-rounded character in the
play but it means the play’s success hinges on her ability to deliver and she
does. She has some fairly solid support in her ensemble with David Terry and
Ben Ager and it’s always good to see Jamie Oxenbould’s comic talents grace the
stage. Jennifer Corren and Karen Pang are yet to fully warm into their roles
but I imagine now the play is running to an audience, this will happen.
The set design is also impressive. Anna Gardiner’s replica
of a grassy camp site, complete with combi van has transformed this small space
thoroughly. Other design elements such as Matthew Marshall’s lighting and Daryl
Wallis’ sound completes the dimensions of the mis-en-scene by bringing the
stage to life in varied and subtle ways. Marshall’s lighting evokes time,
place, season and situation and Wallis’ soundscapes fill the space with those
sounds that provoke our characters, such as the house music, nature,
off-stage voices and weather conditions. So comprehensive is the sound that you
might not even notice that there is an underscore of sound throughout the play
to constantly reference the environment in which the play takes place.
Kilmurry is supported by a great team and having the playwright
sit in during the process so that Baxter can tweak his work during that crucial
rehearsal period is a smart thing. More writers and directors should take
advantage of the collaborative nature of theatre and we should see writers as
part of the active creatives available in staging a show.
I think the audience that emerge each night from ‘Camp’ will exit with
a smile on their faces and certainly with admiration for Doake. So if you’re
after a feel-good, harmless bit of entertainment, ‘Camp’ is as close as you can
get.
Or not: http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/theatre/camp-material-does-not-reward-actors-efforts-20130929-2um65.html#ixzz2gHZq7B8b
ReplyDeleteI couldn't agree with Jason Blake's SMH review more strongly - In short, two hours wasted on a play that makes Carry on Camping looks like The Cherry Orchard.
ReplyDeleteIt's not nice, it's not fun, it's offensively bad.
Really? Well maybe I was in a feel good mood when I saw it but I thought it was a harmless piece of fluff. Not offensive, just 'thin' but with a great lead performer who made it enjoyable.
DeleteIn my view. This play is a defining example of the problem with the Ensemble Theatre. Exciting new and old plays, both international and Australian genrally performed at the highest standard of Theatre in Sydney and THEN in amongst the great- they program this pathetic excuse for a play which nothing for their genaral reputation as a second rate theatre company. Mark Killmurrys' direction of Colin Moody in RED, his extraordinary direction of Frankenstein in particular, put the Ensemble of Par with anything at Belvoir and the STC. I think it is time that Sandra Bates hung up her tired boots and left Killmurry to program. Whilst the subscribers will take some adjusting and a rebuilding period is inevitable, the Ensemble needs to be doing work that would make its founder proud... Camp makes the worst Williamson look like genius.
ReplyDeleteAnd with correct spelling-
ReplyDeleteIn my view. This play is a defining example of the problem with the Ensemble Theatre. Exciting new and old plays, both international and Australian generally performed at the highest standard of Theatre in Sydney and THEN in amongst the great- they program this pathetic excuse for a play which does nothing for their genaral reputation as a second rate theatre company. Mark Killmurrys' direction of Colin Moody in RED, his extraordinary direction of Frankenstein in particular, put the Ensemble on par with anything at Belvoir and the STC. I think it is time that Sandra Bates hung up her tired boots and left Killmurry to program. Whilst the subscribers will take some adjusting and a rebuilding period is inevitable, the Ensemble needs to be doing work that would make its founder proud... Camp makes the worst Williamson look like genius.
You're right in regards to the direction of the company. They are trapped between the possibilities of an exciting future or a stagnating present. Kilmurry does need to be given the full opportunity to program and compete in the Sydney theatre market & he can't do that with Szeps, Williamson and Bates in the wings. I'm predicting that 2014 will be their swan song.
DeleteThe problem is, Szesps, Williamson and Bates still have an audience. And that audience needs to be served just as much as the Kilmurray audience does. And given Williamson is still proven box office (and Szeps has a fair chunk of audience on his own - Bates probably has a sentimental attraction to that audience as well), why should they yield just for a young and funky director (as, well, the STC, Belvoir and Griffin all have in the last couple of years). Isn't part of the worth of the Ensemble that it is a bastion for a particular type of theatre for an older kind of audience? Given it's notoriously the one un-government-funded of the major companies, the Ensemble has to reflect audiences - not what's hip.
DeleteThank you ever so for you article. Really looking forward to read more. Keep writing. Cheap Packers And Movers Melbourne
ReplyDelete