Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you would know that
Samuel Beckett’s ‘Waiting for Godot’ is one of those seminal plays that
redefined theatre in the twentieth century. It catapulted ‘Theatre of the
Absurd’ into the mainstream and fuelled the global existentialist post-World
War II dilemma. We are familiar with its themes of the endless stagnation and meaningless
repetition of life; time as a subjective and painful oppressor; the intrinsic state of loneliness, even when we are with other people; and of course, the biggy, what is the objective truth in reference to faith?
Our two main characters, Vladimir (Hugo Weaving) and
Estragon (Richard Roxburgh) are suffering from a crippling paralysis of action
and even though they talk about breaking the cycle but they never do. Don't we all know that feeling? There is ‘nothing to
be done’ but the same thing every day. In a nutshell, it doesn’t get much
bleaker than this.
This is the third time I’ve seen this play (maybe only the second- it's one of those plays that feels like you've seen it more times than you have) and this will be
the last (I hope). If I am to take the adage ‘to thine own self be true’, I
love this play and I hate this play. I love it for its clever, ground-breaking
ability to present a completely different, depressing world view through the power of its
staging and style. I hate it because it’s painful to watch and it’s meant to be
just that. It’s hard-going and it requires much of its audience to sit in the
silence and repetition of the characters and by inference, reflect our inadequacy to act upon our intentions in a world without meaning.
Yet, there is brilliance in Beckett’s ability to comment on
itself, on society, on the world and on religion. It can feel like eating those
highly potent good-for-you vegetables that you don't want to eat and that take so long to chew in their textual-vitamin-rich-blandness that you'd rather choke to death than digest it.
I tell you this as a long prelude to explain why any
production of this play would struggle to make me love the three hours of watching it. I appreciate it, of
course, but you will still need to rub my back in the last hour as I suffer in the 'endless stagnation of my own existentialist crisis'.
Andrew Upton has given 'Waiting for Godot' a damn red hot go and previous director, Tamas Ascher, who had to pull out of the show, is not missed in this interpretation. Upton has earned his stripes and does great justice to Beckett's masterpiece. If you love this play, you won’t be disappointed. If you struggle with this
play, you won’t be disappointed. If you hate this play, why on earth would you
go and see it in the first place? It would be like getting teeth pulled.
Roxburgh is superb in his physicality
and comic timing and ability. I had forgotten how masterful he is in regards to stage
presence and he steals this show. Add in Weaving's strong performance, they are a powerhouse partnership and there is a dynamic energy and synergy between them. Philip Quast’s Pozzo, especially as
oppressor, was also terrific and Luke Mullins, the only man to have had more
work on stage this year than Toby Schmitz, is utterly transformed and transfixing. The cast
bring it home.
Zsolt Khell’s set design, originally conceived with Ascher, of browns and blacks in the rubble
of this post-apocalyptic world that also pays homage to the run-down theatre of its time is another chance to comment on art and life as indistinguishable. Alice Babidge’s threadbare and worn costumes
are as depressing as the play itself and Nick Schlieper’s lights never make us
feel comfortable as the state makes day grind into hours before hitting night and disappearing back into day so quickly. It’s like my
heart-rate lowers, life has ebbed into a painful chore and relief never comes. Add the underscore
of the discordant sound design of Max Lyandvert and I am completely immersed in
the misery of this world.
The play feels longer than it needs to be and we were all
warned via email days before the show that the advertised 2 hours and 30
minutes was closer to 3 and honestly, I desperately needed it to end. I saw the first preview, which was already a polished and
professional outing, and I imagine they will shave a bit of time off it throughout
the season and if they don’t, go with it- that’s the spirit of the play after
all. And as I stated earlier, this is my crisis in the crisis of the play’s
crisis. It is not the production. It fulfils all you'd want from this play.
If you’ve never seen a production of ‘Waiting for Godot’,
this is a strong, faithful and appropriate production. Roxburgh and Mullins are
incredible but they are all substantial and talented in this cast. If this play can be enjoyed, this is the production to see. Then
have a very stiff drink post-show and maybe a massage.
Saw the play last night, and am utterly perplexed by the fact that approximately 20% of the audience (a full house) did not return to their seats after interval.
ReplyDeleteWith no hiccups on stage and what felt like a fairly supportive audience, I can only conclude that those unfamiliar with the play must have thought it was over? Strange indeed.
Maybe they suddenly had an existential crisis of their own and had to go. I certainly think that the production gave me everything I would want in this play but if you're not in the right frame of mind, it will hurt your brain.
Delete